I’ll start with some belated thoughts on beating the Suns:
Thanks to Andrew, I was in attendance for the Knicks win vs. the Suns — truly a bizarro world experience, as Steve Nash was turning the ball over left and right, and the Knicks were making their threes. The only thing that kept the game close in the first quarter were a number of missed free throws, but fortunately these didn’t come back to haunt the Knicks. Here’s what I took away from the game.
- Larry Hughes’ 10 first quarter assist made him look like the best PG on the team. He pushed the ball, made the easy pass, and kept his options open. He also made sure to look for Gallinari who got off to a quick start. All this in contrast to Duhon who shuts down the first option (to run), and only seems to look for David Lee in the post.
- D’Antoni (and Hughes) exploited Amare’s terrible defense, perfectly. Throughout the first quarter, the Knicks were running plays to get the ball inside, with Hughes often finding players in the paint for WIDE open layups. Amare looks incredibly lost on the defensive end. As bad as Eddy Curry. Worse than Zach Randolph. No amount of athleticism can make up for his lack of awareness. Basically, I don’t think you can have Amare be a franchise player (or 2010 free agent target) because his D is just THAT bad.
- Jared Jeffries had a great game. Blocks. Deflections. Defense. Ball movement. He made a real difference. And fans still booed him when he missed a contested layup in the third quarter. Come on, fans, are you even watching? Boo Jared when he’s playing terribly if you’re going to boo at all.
- Wilson Chandler D’ed up Nash at the top of the key in a zone like defense worked really well.
- Darko is done. Clearly his heart isn’t in it. I’m sure this story didn’t help his cause. But, no PT in this season’s first extensive garbage time seems to spell the end. Fans were even chanting for Darko at the end. Really depressing.
- Finally, Gallo’s great game has to be mentioned. He did everything. His two best plays were probably the ferocious block in the third quarter, and the straight on 3 point bomb from about 5 feet behind the line. Good to see Gallo blow the game open for the Knicks.
In other news:
Good read from Ian Thomson (SI) about how D’Antoni is still Walsh’s most valuable asset moving forward. Most interesting in the article, though, is Walsh addressing the perception that some holdovers in the scouting department may not have been willing to stick their necks out for fear that they aren’t part of Walsh’s plans moving forward. Seems that it’s not just the players suffering from the 2010 cloud.
And finally:
Nate was benched last night in the loss against Orlando. Alan Hahn has the best take on it, asserting that Nate’s clowning around and showmanship are a disruptive and destabilizing force on a team that clearly doesn’t have much sense of ‘team’ or understanding of how to win. Hahn goes on to say that Nate could help a team with a strong veteran, winning culture, and though Nate would have to approve any trade due to his one year contract, it’s hard to imagine him blocking any trade to a winner.
Frank Isola has another worthwhile take on the Nate situation.
And, finally an article from Hoopsworld where Nate and Al talk about the frustration of losing this season.
#1 by AY on December 3, 2009 - 1:51 pm
Quote
Wow, thanks for linking to that SI piece!
Nate isn’t a part of the future. The transition is officially on, where D’antoni will play TD (who deserves it anyway). The vets may be on notice.
I have to agree on Amare. D’Antoni knows him better than anyone – if he’s into it then I’d give it a chance. I don’t think he would be though.
See the full 4th quarter of Hill/Chandler/Landry/TD last night? Blowouts have some positives! Landry looks like he could stick too. About time we found some useful free agent out there.
I wonder where we could trade Nate to? And did you notice that the Mobley situation is still up in the air? If insurance will cover it, we could trade his contract plus Eddy or Jeffries to the Rockets for T-Mac immediately and it would save them a ton of money even factoring in next year.
#2 by YesandtheFoul on December 3, 2009 - 2:45 pm
Quote
I missed last night’s 4th quarter. Some end-of-the-bench guys have athletic promise, but a lack of basketball smarts. With Landry, it’s clear that he’s on the team because he knows how to play. If he can elevate his game to be a 3-point specialist or defensive stopper he’ll become a rotation guy eventually. As it is, I don’t feel like we’re losing something with him out on the floor.
Nice to see TD getting minutes, btw. Pairing him with Hughes playing PG could be a nice backcourt.
I didn’t hear Mobley’s situation is still up in the air. That’s crazy. I’m so confused about it at this point. With this season on the verge of being lost, may as well trade Jeffries now while he has some trade value.
In other news, Spree’s Westchester home is now being forclosed on. Who was managing this guy’s money?! He couldn’t have bought any of these properties outright at the time of purchase?
#3 by AY on December 3, 2009 - 10:00 pm
Quote
It’s been too quiet on the Donnie Walsh front. I remember last year the Jamal Crawford and Z-bo deals came out of nowhere at the same time. I bet there’s a flurry of deals again for us this year, shipping out some combination of Jeffries, Nate, Mobley, maybe Darko, maybe even Al Harrington or Hughes. I still think the teams that make sense for us to trade with are Houston (over luxury tax) and Minnesota (tons of expiring contracts). Unfortunately, it’s a pretty short list.